One of the major problems of being an interpreter is that any minor mistake during an interpretation session can create confusion and mislead the entire proceedings. The selected interpreter must have the capacity and experience level to make precise interpretations in any field. Individuals face various mistaken assumptions that are shockingly common in state courts. Most states require court interpreters, to pass through an assessment to exhibit their language abilities. Moreover, many state courts hire uncertified interpreters to serve during the court proceedings regardless of whether they have finished the certification assessment or not.

Misinterpretation cases by court Interpreters

During a court hearing in Virginia, a man was blamed for the violation of the red light. His interpreter disclosed to him that it was a case of “violación,” which in Spanish does not signify “violation,” however considered “rape”. He was accepting the traffic offense yet denying it because he thought he was accused of a rape assault charge. The interpreter should have used the correct word to ensure a smooth court proceeding without confusing the members of the court and his client. It is critical for overall court proceedings that an interpreter has the proper certifications, capabilities, and experience in the field in which they are practicing.

Interpreter guidelines followed by different States

In past years, eight states dropped certifications of court interpreters. Thirty-two of the 42 states that do certify interpreters demand that courts give an inclination to these certified individuals, yet numerous interpreters state the strategy isn’t generally followed. The Justice Department has ordered a few states to record any problem with the interpreting administrations.

  • In Texas, courts started testing and certifying interpreters in 2000. The state accepts certified interpreters who have proper court understanding and can provide with correct translations during any sort of court proceedings.
  • Arizona will soon have a four-level framework for the certification of Interpreters. The individuals who qualify through the assessment will receive a permanent certification of 2 years based on their performance.
  • In New Jersey, interpreters with lower accreditations can interpret in less major cases of court proceedings. However, interpreters with more experience and proper certification can only deal with major court cases.

Conclusion

A characterized framework database of certified, qualified, and experienced interpreters would definitely help in diminishing the court’s difficulty. There are various situations where courts neglect to offer interpreters in numerous hearings, even after preparing a number of severe government rules for interpreters. Courts regularly disregard those standards, especially in states where there is no supervision for the Interpreters. Thus, an ASL interpreter must have the proper knowledge to perform court proceedings and help their clients in a rightful manner. 

This is where we believe the need for interpreters is important in courtrooms too. They need to be well-qualified for the post. What do you think? Do share it among others so that we may have diverse views and suggestions regarding the same.